Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089025›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2018

Self-motion processing in visual and entorhinal cortices: inputs, integration, and implications for position coding.

Malcolm G Campbell, Lisa M Giocomo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Vision shapes neural maps of space through an ancient midbrain pathway.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malcolm G CampbellDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University , Stanford, California.
Lisa M GiocomoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University , Stanford, California.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
The Ionic Basis of Spatial Codes in Medial Entorhinal CortexR01MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Spatial Codes Across the Medial Entorhinal Cortex for Memory and NavigationR56MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2020 to 2020
$398k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory signals generated by self-motion are complex and multimodal, but the ability to integrate these signals into a unified self-motion percept to guide navigation is essential for animal survival. Here, we summarize classic and recent work on self-motion coding in the visual and entorhinal cortices of the rodent brain. We compare motion processing in rodent and primate visual cortices, highlighting the strengths of classic primate work in establishing causal links between neural activity and perception, and discuss the integration of motor and visual signals in rodent visual cortex. We then turn to the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), where calculations using self-motion to update position estimates are thought to occur. We focus on several key sources of self-motion information to MEC: the medial septum, which provides locomotor speed information; visual cortex, whose input has been increasingly recognized as essential to both position and speed-tuned MEC cells; and the head direction system, which is a major source of directional information for self-motion estimates. These inputs create a large and diverse group of self-motion codes in MEC, and great interest remains in how these self-motion codes might be integrated by MEC grid cells to estimate position. However, which signals are used in these calculations and the mechanisms by which they are integrated remain controversial. We end by proposing future experiments that could further our understanding of the interactions between MEC cells that code for self-motion and position and clarify the relationship between the activity of these cells and spatial perception.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionAnimalsConnectomeEntorhinal CortexLocomotionPrimatesPsychomotor PerformanceRodentiaVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID30089025
PMCPMC6230811
OpenAlexW2886340455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.