Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088672›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2018

Sexual dimorphism in visual and olfactory brain centers in the perfume-collecting orchid bee Euglossa dilemma (Hymenoptera, Apidae).

Philipp Brand, Virginie Larcher, Antoine Couto, Jean-Christophe Sandoz, Santiago R Ramírez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp BrandDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California.
Virginie LarcherEvolution Genomes Behavior and Ecology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, IRD, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Antoine CoutoEvolution Genomes Behavior and Ecology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, IRD, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Jean-Christophe SandozEvolution Genomes Behavior and Ecology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, IRD, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Santiago R RamírezDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California.
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect mating behavior is controlled by a diverse array of sex-specific traits and strategies that evolved to maximize mating success. Orchid bees exhibit a unique suite of perfume-mediated mating behaviors. Male bees collect volatile compounds from their environment to concoct species-specific perfume mixtures that are presumably used to attract conspecific females. Despite a growing understanding of the ecology and evolution of chemical signaling in orchid bees, many aspects of the functional adaptations involved, in particular regarding sensory systems, remain unknown. Here we investigated male and female brain morphology in the common orchid bee Euglossa dilemma Bembé & Eltz. Males exhibited increased relative volumes of the Medulla, a visual brain region, which correlated with larger compound eye size (area). While the overall volume of olfactory brain regions was similar between sexes, the antennal lobes exhibited several sex-specific structures including one male-specific macroglomerulus. These findings reveal sexual dimorphism in both the visual and the olfactory system of orchid bees. It highlights the tendency of an increased investment in the male visual system similar to that observed in other bee lineages, and suggests that visual input may play a more important role in orchid bee male mating behavior than previously thought. Furthermore, our results suggest that the evolution of perfume communication in orchid bees did not involve drastic changes in olfactory brain morphology compared to other bee lineages.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBeesBrainFemaleHeadMalePerfumeSexual Behavior, AnimalSmellVision, OcularPerfumeantennal lobebrain morphologyEuglossamacroglomerulusolfactionorchid beesRRID: SCR_007353sexual dimorphismvision

Identifiers

PMID30088672
PMCPMC6174972
OpenAlexW2885721277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.