Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088298›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

Stability, reliability, and validity of the THINC-it screening tool for cognitive impairment in depression: A psychometric exploration in healthy volunteers.

John E Harrison, Harry Barry, Bernhard T Baune, Michael W Best, Christopher R Bowie, Danielle S Cha, Larry Culpepper, Philippe Fossati, Tracy L Greer, Catherine Harmer and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06907420 (Effects of Multi-Session 40 Hz Visual Stimulation on Neuronal and Psychiatric Outcomes in Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06907420 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Multi-Session 40 Hz Visual Stimulation on Neuronal and Psychiatric Outcomes in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2025 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsNegative Symptoms in Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Disorders, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsVisual stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of THINC-integrated Tool (THINC-it-K): A Tool for Screening Assessment of Cognitive Function in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

John E HarrisonAlzheimer Center, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-4923
Harry BarryStoneylane Clinic Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland.
Bernhard T BauneDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Michael W BestDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Christopher R BowieDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Danielle S ChaMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Larry CulpepperDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Philippe FossatiSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Institut du cerveau et de la moelle (ICM)-Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Tracy L GreerCentre for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Catherine HarmerCognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Esther KlagClinical Psychologist, Rehabilitation Neuropsychologist, Psychotherapist, London, UK.
Raymond W LamBC Leadership Chair in Depression Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yena LeeMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rodrigo B MansurMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hans-Ulrich WittchenInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy and Centre of Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies, (CELOS), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Roger S McIntyreMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University Health Network · CAAssociation of Child Psychotherapists · GBBoston University · USCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKing's College London · GBOur Lady of Lourdes Hospital · IEQueen's University · CATechnische Universität Dresden · DEThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is a need for a brief, reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for screening cognitive deficits in patients with Major Depressive Disorders. This paper examines the psychometric characteristics of THINC-it, a cognitive assessment tool composed of four objective measures of cognition and a self-rated assessment, in subjects without mental disorders.

methodsN = 100 healthy controls with no current or past history of depression were tested on four sequential assessments to examine temporal stability, reliability, and convergent validity of the THINC-it tests. We examined temporal reliability across 1 week and stability via three consecutive assessments. Consistency of assessment by the study rater (intrarater reliability) was calculated using the data from the second and third of these consecutive assessments.

resultsTest-retest reliability correlations varied between Pearson's r = 0.75 and 0.8. Intrarater reliability between 0.7 and 0.93. Stability for the primary measure for each test yielded within-subject standard deviation values between 5.9 and 11.23 for accuracy measures and 0.735 and 17.3 seconds for latency measures. Convergent validity for three tasks was in the acceptable range, but low for the Symbol Check task.

conclusionsAnalysis shows high levels of reliability and stability. Levels of convergent validity were modest but acceptable in the case of all but one test.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultcognitiondepressionmemoryneuropsychologicalscreening

Identifiers

PMID30088298
PMCPMC6174931
OpenAlexW2885843478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.