Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088251›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2018

Projecting Pharmaceutical Expenditure in EU5 to 2021: Adjusting for the Impact of Discounts and Rebates.

Jaime Espin, Michael Schlander, Brian Godman, Pippa Anderson, Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Isabelle Borget, Adam Hutchings, Steven Flostrand, Adam Parnaby, Claudio Jommi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Public health policies for the common interest: rethinking EU states' incentives strategies when a pandemic reshuffles all interests.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaime EspinAndalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-6554
Michael SchlanderDivision of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Brian GodmanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-6972
Pippa AndersonSwansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-2671
Jorge Mestre-FerrandizIndependent Economics Consultant, Madrid, Spain. jormesfer13@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-1321
Isabelle BorgetGustave Roussy, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5352-3521
Adam HutchingsDolon Ltd, London, UK.
Steven FlostrandCelgene International, Boudry, Switzerland.
Adam ParnabyCelgene International, Boudry, Switzerland.
Claudio JommiUniversità del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0356-8710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin (European) healthcare systems, the predominant goal for pharmaceutical expenditure is cost containment. This is due to a general belief among healthcare policy makers that pharmaceutical expenditure-driven by high prices-will be unsustainable unless further reforms are enacted.

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to provide more realistic expectations of pharmaceutical expenditure for all key stakeholder groups by estimating pharmaceutical expenditure at 'net' prices. We also aim to estimate any gaps developing between list and net pharmaceutical expenditure for the EU5 countries (i.e. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK).

methodsWe adjusted an established forecast of pharmaceutical expenditure for the EU5 countries, from 2017 to 2021, by reflecting discounts and rebates not previously considered, i.e. we moved from 'list' to 'net' prices, as far as data were available.

resultsWe found an increasing divergence between expenditure measured at list and net prices. When the forecasts for the five countries were aggregated, the EU5 (unweighted) average historical growth (2010-2016) rate fell from 3.4% compound annual growth rate at list to 2.5% at net. For the forecast, the net growth rate was estimated at 1.5 versus 2.9% at list.

conclusionsOur results suggest that future growth in pharmaceutical expenditure in Europe is likely to be (1) lower than previously understood from forecasts based on list prices and (2) below predicted healthcare expenditure growth in Europe and in line with long-term economic growth rates. For policy makers concerned about the sustainability of pharmaceutical expenditure, this study may provide some comfort, in that the perceived problem is not as large as expected.

Indexed as

Drug CostsEuropean UnionForecastingFranceGermanyHumansItalySpainUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30088251
PMCPMC6244625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.