Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088191›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus.

Joshua D Palmer, Deepak Bhamidipati, Minesh Mehta, Noelle L Williams, Adam P Dicker, Maria Werner-Wasik, Wenyin Shi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Glioblastoma Genomics Primer for Clinicians.Medical research archives · 2020
    Article
  13. Do we really know who has anNeuro-oncology practice · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43215, USA. Joshua.palmer@osumc.edu.
Deepak BhamidipatiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Minesh MehtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Fl, USA.
Noelle L WilliamsSoutheast Radiation Oncology Group, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Adam P DickerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maria Werner-WasikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wenyin ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma predominantly occurs in the 6th and 7th decades of life. The optimal treatment paradigm for elderly patients is not well established. We sampled current worldwide management strategies for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

methodsA web-based survey was developed and distributed to 168 radiation oncologists, neuro-oncologists and neurosurgeons identified through the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties and the CNS committees for North American, European and Asian Organizations. Questions addressed treatment recommendations in order to determine whether management consensus exists in this patient subset.

resultsThere were 68 (40%) respondents. Across respondents, the most important factors directing treatment were KPS (94%) and MGMT methylation status (71%). Only 37% of respondents strictly factor in age when making treatment recommendations with 59% defining elderly as greater than 70 years-old. The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-methylated elderly patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: standard chemoRT (49%), short course chemoRT (39%), and temozolomide alone (30%). The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-unmethylated patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: short course RT alone (51%), standard chemoRT (38%), and short course chemoRT (28%). Treatment recommendations for patients with KPS < 50 were short course RT alone (40%), best supportive care (57%), or TMZ alone (17%). Individuals practicing in North America were significantly more likely to recommend standard chemoradiation for patients compared to their European counterparts.

conclusionWorldwide treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM vary widely. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategy for this subset of patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAntineoplastic ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicDisease ManagementHumansInternationalityPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesElderlyGlioblastomaTreatment recommendations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.