ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Optimal adjuvant therapy in elderly glioblastoma: results from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Hypofractionated versus standard radiation therapy in combination with temozolomide for glioblastoma in the elderly: a meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Age-stratified clinical performance and survival of patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma homogeneously treated by radiotherapy with concomitant and maintenance temozolomide.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Adjuvant Radiation in Older Patients With Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Single Institution Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Immunological and clinicopathological characteristics of C1RL in 2120 glioma patients.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- <Editors' Choice> Impact of maintenance of postoperative performance status on survival in elderly patients over 70 with high-grade astrocytoma.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2020Article
- Disparities in patient enrollment on glioblastoma clinical trials.CNS oncology · 2020Article
- A Glioblastoma Genomics Primer for Clinicians.Medical research archives · 2020Article
- Do we really know who has anNeuro-oncology practice · 2020Article
- Treatment strategies for glioblastoma in older patients: age is just a number.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Treatment of Glioblastoma (GBM) with the Addition of Tumor-Treating Fields (TTF): A Review.Cancers · 2019Review
- Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma predominantly occurs in the 6th and 7th decades of life. The optimal treatment paradigm for elderly patients is not well established. We sampled current worldwide management strategies for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
methodsA web-based survey was developed and distributed to 168 radiation oncologists, neuro-oncologists and neurosurgeons identified through the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties and the CNS committees for North American, European and Asian Organizations. Questions addressed treatment recommendations in order to determine whether management consensus exists in this patient subset.
resultsThere were 68 (40%) respondents. Across respondents, the most important factors directing treatment were KPS (94%) and MGMT methylation status (71%). Only 37% of respondents strictly factor in age when making treatment recommendations with 59% defining elderly as greater than 70 years-old. The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-methylated elderly patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: standard chemoRT (49%), short course chemoRT (39%), and temozolomide alone (30%). The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-unmethylated patients with KPS > 70 were as follows: short course RT alone (51%), standard chemoRT (38%), and short course chemoRT (28%). Treatment recommendations for patients with KPS < 50 were short course RT alone (40%), best supportive care (57%), or TMZ alone (17%). Individuals practicing in North America were significantly more likely to recommend standard chemoradiation for patients compared to their European counterparts.
conclusionWorldwide treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM vary widely. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategy for this subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30088191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.