Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088186›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2018

Efforts, rewards and professional autonomy determine residents' experienced well-being.

S S Lases, Irene A Slootweg, E G J M Pierik, Erik Heineman, M J M H Lombarts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Booster or Killer? Research on Undertaking Transferred Industries and Residents' Well-Being Improvements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S S LasesProfessional Performance Research Group, Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.s.lases@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9026-5250
Irene A SlootwegDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E G J M PierikDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Erik HeinemanDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M J M H LombartsProfessional Performance Research Group, Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLIsala · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The well-being of residents, our future medical specialists, is not only beneficial to the individual physician but also conditional for delivering high-quality patient care. Therefore, the authors further explored how residents experience their own well-being in relation to their professional and personal life. The authors conducted a qualitative study based on a phenomenological approach. From June to October 2013, 13 in-depth interviews were conducted with residents in various training programs using a semi-structured interview guide to explore participants' experience of their well-being in relation to their professional life. The data were collected and analyzed through an iterative process using the thematic network approach. Effort-reward balance and perceived autonomy were dominant overarching experiences in influencing residents' well-being. Experiencing sufficient autonomy was important in residents' roles as caregivers, as learners and in their personal lives. The experienced effort-reward balance could both positively and negatively influence well-being. We found two categories of ways that influence residents' experience of well-being; (1) professional lives: delivering patient care, participating in teamwork, learning at the workplace and dealing with the organization and (2) personal lives: dealing with personal characteristics and balancing work-life. In residents' well-being experiences, the effort-reward balance and perceived autonomy are crucial. Additionally, ways that influence residents' well-being are identified in both their professional and personal lives. These dominant experiences and ways that influence well-being could be key factors for interventions and residency training adaptations for enhancing residents' well-being.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyProfessional AutonomyRewardAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicPatient Care TeamPhysiciansPhysician's RoleWork-Life BalanceWorkplaceEffort–reward balanceInfluencing factorsPostgraduate medical educationProfessional autonomyProfessional lifeResidents’ experienced well-being

Identifiers

PMID30088186
PMCPMC6245087
OpenAlexW2887924325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.