ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
An automatic multi-class coronary atherosclerosis plaque detection and classification framework.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Recent Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Deep learning predicts cardiovascular disease risks from lung cancer screening low dose computed tomography.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Machine Learning for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Cardiac CT: A Survey.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of different classes of atherosclerotic plaques is important for early intervention of coronary artery diseases. However, previous methods focused either on the detection of a specific class of coronary plaques or on the distinction between plaques and normal arteries, neglecting the classification of different classes of plaques. Therefore, we proposed an automatic multi-class coronary atherosclerosis plaque detection and classification framework. Firstly, we retrieved the transverse cross sections along centerlines from the computed tomography angiography. Secondly, we extracted the region of interests based on coarse segmentation. Thirdly, we extracted a random radius symmetry (RRS) feature vector, which incorporates multiple descriptions into a random strategy and greatly augments the training data. Finally, we fed the RRS feature vector into the multi-class coronary plaque classifier. In experiments, we compared our proposed framework with other methods on the cross sections of Rotterdam Coronary Datasets, including 729 non-calcified plaques, 511 calcified plaques, and 546 mixed plaques. Our RRS with support vector machine outperforms the intensity feature vector and the random forest classifier, with the average precision of 92.6 ± 1.9% and average recall of 94.3 ± 2.1%. The proposed framework provides a computer-aided diagnostic method for multi-class plaque detection and classification. Graphical abstract Diagram of the proposed automatic multi-class coronary atherosclerosis plaque detection and classification framework. ᅟ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30088125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.