Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088106›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2018

PACAP38 and PAC

Eloisa Rubio-Beltrán, Edvige Correnti, Marie Deen, Katharina Kamm, Tim Kelderman, Laura Papetti, Simone Vigneri, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Lars Edvinsson, European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS)

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Sex-specific considerations in migraine therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Structural basis of modified ligand selectivity from N-terminal PAC1R alternative splicing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Calcitonin/PACTrends in pharmacological sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Future targets for migraine treatment beyond CGRP.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Eloisa Rubio-BeltránDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.rubiobeltran@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-3632
Edvige CorrentiDepartment of Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Marie DeenDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Katharina KammDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tim KeldermanDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Laura PapettiHeadache Center, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simone VigneriDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Palermo; Pain Medicine Unit, Santa Maria Maddalena Hospital, Occhiobello, Italy.
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrinkDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lars EdvinssonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS)
Erasmus MC · NLBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITGhent University Hospital · BEGlostrup Hospital · DKLa Maddalena · ITLMU Klinikum · DELund University · SEUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38) is a widely distributed neuropeptide involved in neuroprotection, neurodevelopment, nociception and inflammation. Moreover, PACAP38 is a potent inducer of migraine-like attacks, but the mechanism behind this has not been fully elucidated.Migraine is a neurovascular disorder, recognized as the second most disabling disease. Nevertheless, the antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor are the only prophylactic treatment developed specifically for migraine. These antibodies have displayed positive results in clinical trials, but are not effective for all patients; therefore, new pharmacological targets need to be identified.Due to the ability of PACAP38 to induce migraine-like attacks, its location in structures previously associated with migraine pathophysiology and the 100-fold selectivity for the PAC

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHeadacheHumansMigraine DisordersPituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating PolypeptideReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, Type IPituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating PolypeptideReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, Type IMigrainePAC1 receptorPACAPProphylactic treatment

Identifiers

PMID30088106
PMCPMC6081277
OpenAlexW2885895791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.