Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30088030›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Mid-term clinical and radiological results do not differ between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using titanium-nitride-coated posterior-stabilized prostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Cheol Hee Park, Se Gu Kang, Dae Kyung Bae, Sang Jun Song

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheol Hee ParkDepartment of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Se Gu KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Dae Kyung BaeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Sang Jun SongDepartment of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea. tesstore@empas.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to prospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results between mobile-bearing (MB) and fixed-bearing (FB) TKAs using ceramic titanium nitride (TiN)-coated prostheses.

methodsSeventy MB and 70 FB TKAs using TiN-coated prostheses (ACS

resultsThere were no differences between the two groups in clinical scores or ROM (n.s.). The maximum flexion increased from 133.5° ± 8.3° to 137.6° ± 5.5° across all time points in the MB group. The serial maximum flexion angles did not differ between the two groups over time (n.s.). The average thickness of the PE insert was greater in the MB group (12.0 ± 1.9 vs. 11.2 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, p = 0.008), especially when a large femoral component was used (12.7 ± 1.9 vs. 11.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.005). The pre- and postoperative mechanical axes and positions of the components did not differ between the two groups (n.s.).

conclusionsTiN-coated MB TKA showed no significant advantage over FB TKA. The selection of bearing design would be clinically insignificant when using the TiN-coated TKA prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePolyethylenePreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesPolyethyleneTitaniumtitanium nitrideArthroplastyFixed-bearingKneeMobile-bearingTitanium nitride

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.