Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087874›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of public health2018

Challenges of Confidentiality in Clinical Settings: Compilation of an Ethical Guideline.

Mahshad Noroozi, Ladannaz Zahedi, Fataneh Sadat Bathaei, Pooneh Salari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Assessment ofNew microbes and new infections · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Audiovisual recordings of patients: developing an ethical guideline in Iran.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahshad NorooziMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ladannaz ZahediMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fataneh Sadat BathaeiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pooneh SalariMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespecting patients confidentiality and privacy are considered as the patients' rights. Confidentiality is the key virtue for trust building in physician-patient relationship. While law considers confidentiality as absolute except for legal situations, despite efforts to maintaining confidentiality, sometimes breaching confidentiality is unavoidable but not necessarily unethical. There is no Iranian unified ethical guideline to define clear approaches to patient confidentiality in clinical setting. To keep all medical data confidential it is necessary to identify the scope of the problem. In this study, we aimed at identifying the scope of the problem.

methodsThis study was conducted in three phases including literature review, qualitative study (semi-structured interview) and focus group discussion. The literature review provided a framework for the second phase.

resultsThe content analysis of the interviews presented 3 main themes indicating problems in maintaining confidentiality in clinical setting including management issues, organizational ethics and physician-patient relationship.

conclusionBased on the results a draft guideline in confidentiality in clinical setting was prepared and finalized in focus groups discussions.

Indexed as

Clinical settingConfidentialityConfidentiality guidelineMedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID30087874
PMCPMC6077627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.