Correction to: Participation of the caudal cerebellar lobule IX to the dorsal attentional network.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Lobular and Voxel-Wise Genetic Influences on Cerebellar Gray Matter Volume and Associations With Social and Trait Anxiety in Twins.Human brain mapping · 2026
   Article
2. A mutation in the PRKAR1B gene drives pathological mechanisms of neurodegeneration across species.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
   Article
3. Enhanced neural mechanisms of set shifting in musically trained adolescents and young adults: converging fMRI, EEG, and behavioral evidence.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
   Article
4. Cortico-cerebellar networks for visual attention and working memory.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Participation of the caudal cerebellar lobule IX to the dorsal attentional network.2018

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract