Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087630›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Artificial Grammar Learning Capabilities in an Abstract Visual Task Match Requirements for Linguistic Syntax.

Gesche Westphal-Fitch, Beatrice Giustolisi, Carlo Cecchetto, Jordan S Martin, W Tecumseh Fitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sociolinguistic Context Constrains Bilingual Advantages in Metacognition.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recursion in programs, thought, and language.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gesche Westphal-FitchDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Beatrice GiustolisiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Carlo CecchettoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Jordan S MartinDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
W Tecumseh FitchDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF T 827Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262European Research Council 230604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether pattern-parsing mechanisms are specific to language or apply across multiple cognitive domains remains unresolved. Formal language theory provides a mathematical framework for classifying pattern-generating rule sets (or "grammars") according to complexity. This framework applies to patterns at any level of complexity, stretching from simple sequences, to highly complex tree-like or net-like structures, to any Turing-computable set of strings. Here, we explored human pattern-processing capabilities in the visual domain by generating abstract visual sequences made up of abstract tiles differing in form and color. We constructed different sets of sequences, using artificial "grammars" (rule sets) at three key complexity levels. Because human linguistic syntax is classed as "mildly context-sensitive," we specifically included a visual grammar at this complexity level. Acquisition of these three grammars was tested in an artificial grammar-learning paradigm: after exposure to a set of well-formed strings, participants were asked to discriminate novel grammatical patterns from non-grammatical patterns. Participants successfully acquired all three grammars after only minutes of exposure, correctly generalizing to novel stimuli and to novel stimulus lengths. A Bayesian analysis excluded multiple alternative hypotheses and shows that the success in rule acquisition applies both at the group level and for most participants analyzed individually. These experimental results demonstrate rapid pattern learning for abstract visual patterns, extending to the mildly context-sensitive level characterizing language. We suggest that a formal equivalence of processing at the mildly context sensitive level in the visual and linguistic domains implies that cognitive mechanisms with the computational power to process linguistic syntax are not specific to the domain of language, but extend to abstract visual patterns with no meaning.

Indexed as

artificial grammar learningformal language theorylong-distance dependenciesmildly context sensitive grammarsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30087630
PMCPMC6066649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.