Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087568›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

Comparable efficacy and less toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus epirubicin for neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a case-control study.

Minjun Dong, Liang Luo, Xiaogang Ying, Xianqiu Lu, Jianguo Shen, Zhinong Jiang, Linbo Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Minjun DongDepartment of Surgical Oncology, linbowang@zju.edu.cn.
Liang LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital.
Xiaogang YingZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xianqiu LuZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo ShenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, linbowang@zju.edu.cn.
Zhinong JiangDepartment of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Linbo WangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, linbowang@zju.edu.cn.
Society of Surgical Oncology · USSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and epirubicin are both superior variants of doxorubicin and are commonly applied as basic chemotherapeutics in breast cancer. However, the direct comparison of their efficacy and side effects has not been adequately reported. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of PLD and epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWomen (n = 43) with invasive breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the regimens containing PLD (PLD group) were analyzed and 1:2 matched with those (n = 86) who received regimens containing epirubicin (epirubicin group) according to clinical TNM staging and taxane combination.

resultsThe PLD group achieved similar clinical response rate in neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to the epirubicin group (76.7% vs 75.6%). The PLD group had a lower rate of grade 3 & 4 neutropenia (30.2% vs 60.5%), vomiting (7.0% vs 28.0%), and grade 3 & 4 alopecia (9.3% vs 43.0%), yet a higher rate of mouth ulceration (46.5% vs 11.7%). For the cardiac toxicity, the PLD group had a significantly lower rate of ventricular premature beat compared with the epirubicin group (7.0% vs 20.9%,

conclusionIn neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer, PLD provides potentially similar efficacy and relatively less toxicity compared to epirubicin.

Indexed as

breast cancerefficacyepirubicinneoadjuvant chemotherapypegylated liposomal doxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID30087568
PMCPMC6061676
OpenAlexW2884289914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.