ArticleScientific reports2018
An Integrated Local Classification Model of Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions via Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for drug-drug interaction prediction from computational discovery to clinical application.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Drug-drug interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Machine learning-based quantitative prediction of drug exposure in drug-drug interactions using drug label information.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Predict multi-type drug-drug interactions in cold start scenario.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991-2020).Annals of operations research · 2021Article
- Database of adverse events associated with drugs and drug combinations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A unified solution for different scenarios of predicting drug-target interactions via triple matrix factorization.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may trigger adverse drug reactions, which endanger the patients. DDI identification before making clinical medications is critical but bears a high cost in clinics. Computational approaches, including global model-based and local model based, are able to screen DDI candidates among a large number of drug pairs by utilizing preliminary characteristics of drugs (e.g. drug chemical structure). However, global model-based approaches are usually slow and don't consider the topological structure of DDI network, while local model-based approaches have the degree-induced bias that a new drug tends to link to the drug having many DDI. All of them lack an effective ensemble method to combine results from multiple predictors. To address the first two issues, we propose a local classification-based model (LCM), which considers the topology of DDI network and has the relaxation of the degree-induced bias. Furthermore, we design a novel supervised fusion rule based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence (LCM-DS), which aggregates the results from multiple LCMs. To make the final prediction, LCM-DS integrates three aspects from multiple classifiers, including the posterior probabilities output by individual classifiers, the proximity between their instance decision profiles and their reference profiles, as well as the quality of their reference profiles. Last, the substantial comparison with three state-of-the-art approaches demonstrates the effectiveness of our LCM, and the comparison with both individual LCM implementations and classical fusion algorithms exhibits the superiority of our LCM-DS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.