Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087288›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2018

Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review.

Francesco Domenico Di Blasi, Serafino Buono, Santina Città, Angela Antonia Costanzo, Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Domenico Di BlasiOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73, 94018 Troina, Italy. fdiblasi@oasi.en.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-2927
Serafino BuonoOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73, 94018 Troina, Italy. fbuono@oasi.en.it.
Santina CittàOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73, 94018 Troina, Italy. scitta@oasi.en.it.
Angela Antonia CostanzoOasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Via Conte Ruggero, 73, 94018 Troina, Italy. acostanzo@oasi.en.it.
Pierluigi ZoccolottiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. pierluigi.zoccolotti@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-2455
Oasi Maria SS · ITInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn children with intellectual disability (ID), the acquisition of reading skills constitutes a basic step towards the possibility of independent living, social inclusion and participation.

methodsWe carried out a narrative review of the literature on reading fluency and accuracy of individuals with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes (Fragile X, Williams, Velocardiofacial, Prader-Willi, and Down syndrome). Our aim was to define their reading profiles in light of the dual-route reading model. For this purpose, studies that examined both word and non-word reading in children with ID were included in the analysis.

resultsSeventeen studies emerged based on the selection criteria. The results were different depending on the control group used. A deficit in reading non-words emerged in studies that used the reading-level match design but not when standardized scores were used, when controls were age-matched or when a mental age matching was used. Thus, a deficit in reading non-words emerged only in studies that used the reading-level match design. However, severe methodological criticisms were recently raised about the use of this matching design.

conclusionsIn view of the methodological problems in using grade equivalents, it is premature to draw definite conclusions about the reading profile of children with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes. In any case, the reviewed evidence provides little support for the idea that children with ID have selective difficulty in phonological reading. Thus, the reading profile of children with ID remains an open question that needs to be investigated by means of methodologically sound research.

Indexed as

genetic syndromeintellectual disabilityreading

Identifiers

PMID30087288
PMCPMC6119986
OpenAlexW2886538225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.