Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087210›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Opinion: Risk to study nonparticipants: A procedural approach.

Nir Eyal, Marc Lipsitch, Till Bärnighausen, Dan Wikler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel methods for health intervention research.Journal of health monitoring · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nir EyalDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115; neyal@hsph.harvard.edu.
Marc LipsitchCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Till BärnighausenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Dan WiklerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

Funding

HIV cure studies: risk, risk perception, and ethicsR01AI114617 · NIAID · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI EYAL, NIR · 2015 to 2018
$3.2M
Causal Pathways to population health impact of HIV antiretroviral treatmentR01HD084233 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2015 to 2021
$2.3M
Can HIV Hot-Spots be eradicated? An intervention to decrease HIV transmission to young women in rural KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaR01AI124389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114617NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI124389NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084233Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208766/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchPatient ComplianceAttitudeHumansResearchResearch PersonnelRiskSelf-ControlSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30087210
PMCPMC6094093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.