Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087105›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Highly Contiguous Genome Assemblies of 15

Danny E Miller, Cynthia Staber, Julia Zeitlinger, R Scott Hawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lifestyles ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danny E MillerStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO danny.miller@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6096-8601
Cynthia StaberStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO.
Julia ZeitlingerStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO.
R Scott HawleyStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-0494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophilaGenotypeINDEL MutationNanoporesPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADrosophilaGenome assemblyNanopore sequencingthird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30087105
PMCPMC6169393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.