Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30087047›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia.

Miguel Pugliese-Garcia, Leonard W Heyerdahl, Chanda Mwamba, Sharon Nkwemu, Roma Chilengi, Rachel Demolis, Elise Guillermet, Anjali Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Drivers of Low Vaccination Utilization in Niger.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miguel Pugliese-GarciaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot # 34620, P.O. Box 34681, Lusaka 10101, Zambia. Electronic address: Miguel.Pugliese-Garcia@lshtm.ac.uk.
Leonard W HeyerdahlAgence de Médecine Préventive, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Chanda MwambaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot # 34620, P.O. Box 34681, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.
Sharon NkwemuCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot # 34620, P.O. Box 34681, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.
Roma ChilengiCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot # 34620, P.O. Box 34681, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.
Rachel DemolisAgence de Médecine Préventive, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Elise GuillermetAgence de Médecine Préventive, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Anjali SharmaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot # 34620, P.O. Box 34681, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeterogeneous coverage threatens to compromise the effectiveness of immunization programs in Zambia. Demand-creation initiatives are needed to address this; however, there is incomplete understanding of why vaccine coverage is suboptimal. We investigated overarching perceptions on vaccine acceptability, hesitancy, and accessibility at three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia.

methodsNested within a cholera vaccination uptake study, we sought to understand overarching perceptions on vaccines' hesitancy in three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia. We conducted 48 focus group discussions with a convenience sample of laypersons, lay healthcare workers, neighbourhood health committee members and vaccinators.

resultsBoth laypersons and community-based health actors reported high vaccine acceptance though several sources of hesitancy were reported. Traditional remedies, alcohol use and religious beliefs emerged as drivers of vaccine hesitancy, likely reinforced by a background of distrust towards western medicine. Also mentioned were previous adverse events, fear of injections and low perceived need for immunization. Limited understanding of how vaccines work and overlapping local terms for vaccine and other medical concepts created confusion and inaccurate views and expectations. Some reported refusing injections to avoid pain and perceived risk of infection. Discussants emphasised the importance of education and preferred mobile immunization campaigns, with weekend to reach those with poor access and delivered by a combination of professional and volunteer workers.

conclusionsVaccine hesitancy in Zambia is underpinned by many factors including personal experiences with vaccinations, alternative belief models, limited knowledge, deep misunderstanding about how vaccines work, and barriers to access. To overcome these, community-driven models that incorporate factual communication by professionals and operate outside of traditional hours, may help. Better research to understand community preferences for vaccine uptake could inform interventions to improve immunization coverage in Zambia.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationVaccination RefusalVaccinesYoung AdultVaccinesInformal settlementsPerceived effectivenessPerceived safetyVaccine acceptanceVaccine hesitancyZambia

Identifiers

PMID30087047
PMCPMC6143480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.