ArticleTalanta2018
In-capillary microextraction for direct mass spectrometry analysis of biological samples.
Article in Talanta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developments and Applications of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based In-Tube Solid Phase Microextraction Technique for Efficient Sample Preparation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Portable mass spectrometry system: instrumentation, applications, and path to 'omics analysis.Proteomics · 2022Review
- High-Throughput Liquid-Liquid Extractions with Nanoliter Volumes.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- High-Precision Quantitation of Biofluid Samples Using Direct Mass Spectrometry Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Direct sampling mass spectrometry for clinical analysis.The Analyst · 2019Review
- Electrokinetic Manipulations Combined With Direct and Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Slug flow microextraction (SFME)-nanoESI was originally explored as a single-step sampling ionization method for MS analysis of biofluids. In this work, a comprehensive study and development of the SFME has been carried out. Revers-phase SFME was developed to analyze chemical compounds in oil samples. A three-phase SFME system was introduced as a suitable approach for analyzing polar compounds in biofluids. The impacts by the capillary inner diameter, solvent and sample properties were also investigated, leading the use of fused silica capillaries for performing SFME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.