Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30086800›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2018

Gastric heterotopic pancreas and stromal tumors smaller than 3 cm in diameter: clinical and computed tomography findings.

Li-Ming Li, Lei-Yu Feng, Xiao-Hua Chen, Pan Liang, Jing Li, Jian-Bo Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparing endoscopic ultrasonography and double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of gastric stromal tumor.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Ming LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Lei-Yu FengDepartment of Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Xiao-Hua ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Pan LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Jian-Bo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China. gaojianbo_cancer@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.81701687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying gastric heterotopic pancreas and stromal tumors is difficult. Few studies have reported computed tomography (CT) findings for differentiating lesions less than 3 cm in diameter. In this study, we aimed to identify clinical characteristics and CT findings that can differentiate gastric heterotopic pancreatic lesions from stromal tumors less than 3 cm in diameter.

methodsA total of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric heterotopic pancreas (n = 66) and stromal tumors (n = 66) were included. Each group was divided into primary (n = 50) and validation cohort (n = 16). Clinical characteristics and CT findings were retrospectively reviewed. CT findings included location, border, contour, growth pattern, enhancement pattern and grade, the enhancement value of tumor, enhancement ratio of tumor, and enhancement ratio of tumor to pancreas in venous phase. The findings in the two groups were compared using the Pearson χ

resultsSignificant differences were observed between heterotopic pancreas and stromal tumors in the distribution of tumor location, border, contour (all P < 0.001), enhancement values (P < 0.001), enhancement ratios of tumors (P < 0.001), and enhancement ratios of tumors to pancreas (P < 0.001). No significant differences existed in growth pattern (P = 0.203). The area under the curve differed significantly between enhancement ratio of tumor to pancreas and enhancement ratio (P = 0.030). There were significant differences in above characteristics between two groups in validation cohort.

conclusionsHeterotopic pancreas has characteristic CT features differentiating it from stromal tumors.

Indexed as

PancreasTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedChoristomaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedComputed tomographyGastricHeterotopic pancreasStromal tumor

Identifiers

PMID30086800
PMCPMC6081935
OpenAlexW2886072808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.