Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30086446›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2018

Synthesis at the interface of virology and genetic code expansion.

Rachel E Kelemen, Sarah B Erickson, Abhishek Chatterjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Update of the Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase/tRNAJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E KelemenDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, 246B Merkert Chemistry Center, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, United States.
Sarah B EricksonDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, 246B Merkert Chemistry Center, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, United States.
Abhishek ChatterjeeDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, 246B Merkert Chemistry Center, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, United States. Electronic address: abhishek.chatterjee@bc.edu.
Boston College · US

Funding

A novel approach to define the roles of oxidative and nitrative post-trasnlational modifications of tryptophan in human biologyR01GM124319 · NIGMS · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI CHATTERJEE, ABHISHEK · 2017 to 2019
$916k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How a virus efficiently invades its host cell and masterfully engineers its properties provides valuable lessons and resources for the emerging discipline of synthetic biology, which seeks to create engineered biological systems with novel functions. Recently, the toolbox of synthetic biology has also been enriched by the genetic code expansion technology, which has provided access to a large assortment of unnatural amino acids with novel chemical functionalities that can be site-specifically incorporated into proteins in living cells. The synergistic interplay of these two disciplines holds much promise to advance their individual progress, while creating new paradigms for synthetic biology. In this review we seek to provide an account of the recent advances at the interface of these two research areas.

Indexed as

Genetic CodeAmino AcidsAnimalsGenetic EngineeringHumansProtein EngineeringProteinsSynthetic BiologyVirusesAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID30086446
PMCPMC6446078
OpenAlexW2885112864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.