Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30086149›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Should prevention of falls start earlier? Co-ordinated analyses of harmonised data on falls in middle-aged adults across four population-based cohort studies.

Geeske Peeters, Natasja M van Schoor, Rachel Cooper, Leigh Tooth, Rose Anne Kenny

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of combined protein and exercise interventions on bone health in middle-aged and older adults - A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A comprehensive assessment of risk factors for falls in middle-aged adults: co-ordinated analyses of cohort studies in four countries.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Geeske PeetersGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, California, United States of America | Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-7026
Natasja M van SchoorAmsterdam Public Health Research institute, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rachel CooperMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Leigh ToothFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Rose Anne KennyGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, California, United States of America | Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
The University of Queensland · AUAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of risk factors for falls increases during middle-age, but the prevalence of falls in this age-range is often overlooked and understudied. The aim was to calculate the prevalence of falls in middle-aged adults (aged 40-64 years) from four countries. Data were from four population-based cohort studies from Australia (Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, n = 10556, 100% women, 51-58 years in 2004), Ireland (The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, n = 4968, 57.5% women, 40-64 years in 2010), the Netherlands (Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, n = 862, 51.6% women, 55-64 years in 2012-13) and Great Britain (MRC National Survey of Health and Development, n = 2821, 50.9% women, 53 years in 1999). In each study, falls assessment was based on recall of any falls in the past year. The prevalence of falls was calculated for the total group, for each country, for men and women separately, and for 5-year age-bands. The prevalence was higher in Australia (27.8%, women only) and the Netherlands (25.1%) than in Ireland (17.6%) and Great Britain (17.8%, p<0.001). Women (27.0%) had higher prevalences than men (15.2%, p<0.001). The prevalence increased from 8.7% in 40-44 year olds to 29.9% in 60-64 year olds in women, and from 14.7% in 45-49 year olds to 15.7% in 60-64 year olds in men. Even within 5-year age-bands, there was substantial variation in prevalence between the four cohorts. Weighting for age, sex and education changed the prevalence estimates by less than 2 percentage points. The sharp increase in prevalence of falls in middle-age, particularly among women supports the notion that falls are not just a problem of old age, and that middle-age may be a critical life stage for preventive interventions.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceSex FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30086149
PMCPMC6080796
OpenAlexW2887408864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.