Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30086097›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2019

Changes in Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplant Allocation Policy May Impact Postliver Transplant Outcomes.

Giuseppe Cullaro, Ryutaro Hirose, Jennifer C Lai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2020
    Review
  7. Chronic Kidney Disease in Liver Transplant Candidates: A Rising Burden Impacting Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuseppe CullaroDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Ryutaro HiroseDivision of Transplant Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Jennifer C LaiDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
NRSA Hepatology Training GrantT32DK060414 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Mandana Khalili, JACQUELYN J. MAHER · 2002 to 2026
$6.8M
Frailty and Functional Status in Older Liver Transplant PatientsK23AG048337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAI, JENNIFER C. · 2014 to 2018
$911k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048337NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK060414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant allocation was based on serum creatinine, a metric that disadvantaged women relative to men. A recent SLK transplant policy change uses estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which accounts for sex-based differences in creatinine.

methodsTo understand the impact of this new policy, we analyzed nonstatus 1 adults listed for liver transplantation (LT) from May 2007 to July 2014, excluding those with exceptions. We defined patients who met the new SLK policy as having an eGFR <60 mL/min for 90 days, with a final eGFR <30 mL/min.

resultsOf 40979 candidates, 1683 would have met only the new criteria (N-SLK), 2452 would have met only the old criteria (O-SLK), and 1878 would have met both criteria (B-SLK). Compared to those in the B-SLK or O-SLK groups, those in the N-SLK group were significantly more likely to be female (52% versus 36% versus 39%, P < 0.001). Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that in adjusted analysis those in the N-SLK group were significantly less likely to die postliver transplant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.0; P < 0.001). Further, in Cox regression subgroup analyses, both in women (HR 0.04; P < 0.001) and in men (HR, 0.02, P < 0.001) those in the N-SLK group who underwent liver transplant were significantly less likely to die postliver transplant, even after adjustment for confounders.

conclusionsWe anticipate that implementation of the new SLK policy will increase the proportion of women and decrease the proportion of men who are listed for SLK but may not improve posttransplant survival. Our data highlight the need for monitoring of SLK outcomes after implementation of the new policy.

Indexed as

AdultCreatinineEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHealth Plan ImplementationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPolicyCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID30086097
PMCPMC6363909
OpenAlexW2886779835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.