Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30085305›Full record

ArticleSleep2018

Assessment of infant sleep: how well do multiple methods compare?

Marie Camerota, Kristin P Tully, Melissa Grimes, Noa Gueron-Sela, Cathi B Propper

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Practical Application of Polysomnography in Infants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Machine Learning-Derived Active Sleep as an Early Predictor of White Matter Development in Preterm Infants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Post-PICU sleep efficiency and quality of life in infants and toddlers with acquired brain injury.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie CamerotaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kristin P TullyCarolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Melissa GrimesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Noa Gueron-SelaDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Cathi B PropperCenter for Developmental Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Infant Sleep Development: Contributions of Infant Vagal Tone and ParentingR21HD077146 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PROPPER, CATHI BARBRA · 2014 to 2015
$414k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD077146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study compares sleep variables obtained from videosomnography, actigraphy, and sleep diaries, three of the most common sleep assessment methods used in infant sleep studies. Using a sample of 90 African American 3-month olds, we compare correlations and discrepancies for seven sleep variables across each of the three pairs of assessment methods for one night of a week-long sleep study. These seven variables are indicative of sleep schedule (e.g. sleep onset time, rise time), duration (e.g. sleep period, sleep time, wake time), and fragmentation (e.g. night wakings, longest sleep period). We find that across all sleep assessment methods, correlations are highest for variables indicative of sleep schedule, and lowest for variables indicative of sleep fragmentation. Comparing the magnitude and significance of the discrepancies, we find that actigraphy and sleep diaries significantly overestimate sleep period duration and underestimate the number of night waking episodes, compared with videosomnography. Actigraphy and sleep diaries were more concordant with one another than with videosomnography. Epoch-by-epoch analyses indicated that actigraphy had low sensitivity to detect wakefulness, compared with videosomnography. Contrary to our hypothesis, the discrepancies between sleep assessment methods did not vary widely based on infant sleep location (own room vs. parent's room) or sleep surface (own bed vs. parent's bed). Limitations and implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

Indexed as

ActigraphyBlack or African AmericanEnvironmentFemaleHumansInfantMaleParentsPolysomnographySleepSleep DeprivationSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID30085305
PMCPMC6187103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.