Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30085287›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2019

Implementing a small media intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics.

Cathy L Melvin, Anissa I Vines, Allison M Deal, Holly O Pierce, William R Carpenter, Paul A Godley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathy L MelvinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Anissa I VinesDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (UNC).
Allison M DealBiostatistics Shared Resource, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Holly O PierceDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
William R CarpenterUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Paul A GodleyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, UNC.

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Training ProgramU54CA153602 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.4M
Increasing Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment in North Carolina CommunitiesU01CA114629 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2005 to 2009
$4.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114629NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the USA. In 2017, an estimated 135,420 people were diagnosed with CRC and 50,260 people died from CRC. Several screening modalities are recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), including annual stool tests that are usually completed at home and under-used compared with colonoscopy despite stated patient preferences for an alternative to colonoscopy. The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends use of small media interventions (SMIs) to increase CRC screening and calls for a greater understanding of its independent impact on screening participation. This study tested whether a SMI increased the likelihood of participant return of a USPSTF recommended Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). In total, 804 individuals participated in a two-group, prospective randomized controlled trial. Descriptive statistics with chi-square tests compared differences in participant characteristics and return rates. Multivariable log-binomial modeling estimated combined effects of patient characteristics with FIT return rates. No differences in return rates were observed overall or by participant characteristics other than the year of enrollment. A multivariable model controlling for all covariates, found gender, insurance type, and regular place for healthcare to be significantly associated with return rates. Receipt of the SMI did not independently increase overall return rates but it may have improved the ease of completing the FIT by some participants, particularly women, those with insurance, and those with a regular place for healthcare.

Indexed as

AgedAwarenessCase-Control StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCommunications MediaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient PreferenceColorectal cancer screeningPrimary careScreening barrierSmall media intervention

Identifiers

PMID30085287
PMCPMC7184871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.