Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30085274›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

Distinct genomic profile and specific targeted drug responses in adult cerebellar glioblastoma.

Hee Jin Cho, Junfei Zhao, Sang Won Jung, Erik Ladewig, Doo-Sik Kong, Yeon-Lim Suh, Yeri Lee, Donggeon Kim, Sun Hee Ahn, Mykola Bordyuh and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of RAS in CNS Tumors: A Key Player or an Overlooked Oncogene?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The inverse paradigm and the ancestral cell of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hee Jin ChoInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Junfei ZhaoDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sang Won JungInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Erik LadewigDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Doo-Sik KongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon-Lim SuhDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeri LeeInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Donggeon KimInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Sun Hee AhnInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Mykola BordyuhDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Hyun Ju KangInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Jason K SaInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Yun Jee SeoInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Tae KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Hoon LimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yun-Sik DhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Il LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Jun SeolDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Won ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woong-Yang ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Raul RabadanDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Do-Hyun NamInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRColumbia University · USSamsung (South Korea) · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

Evolutionary Heterogeneity of High Grade GliomaF99CA212478 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LADEWIG, ERIK · 2016 to 2017
$83k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA212478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite extensive efforts on the genomic characterization of gliomas, very few studies have reported the genetic alterations of cerebellar glioblastoma (C-GBM), a rare and lethal disease. Here, we provide a systematic study of C-GBM to better understand its specific genomic features. Methods: We collected a cohort of C-GBM patients and compared patient demographics and tumor pathologies with supratentorial glioblastoma (S-GBM). To uncover the molecular characteristics, we performed DNA and mRNA sequencing and DNA methylation arrays on 19, 6, and 4 C-GBM cases, respectively. Moreover, chemical drug screening was conducted to identify potential therapeutic options for C-GBMs. Results: Despite differing anatomical origins of C-GBM and S-GBM, neither histological, cytological, nor patient demographics appeared significantly different between the 2 types. However, we observed striking differences in mutational patterns, including frequent alterations of ATRX, PDGFRA, NF1, and RAS and absence of EGFR alterations in C-GBM. These results show a distinct evolutionary path in C-GBM, suggesting specific therapeutic targeted options. Targeted-drug screening revealed that C-GBMs were more responsive to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor and resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors than S-GBMs. Also, differential expression analysis indicated that C-GBMs may have originated from oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, suggesting that different types of cells can undergo malignant transformation according to their location in brain. Master regulator analysis with differentially expressed genes between C-GBM and proneural S-GBM revealed NR4A1 as a potential therapeutic target. Conclusions: Our results imply that unique gliomagenesis mechanisms occur in adult cerebellum and new treatment strategies are needed to provide greater therapeutic benefits for C-GBM patients. Key Points: 1. Distinct genomic profiles of 19 adult cerebellar GBMs were characterized. 2. MEK inhibitor was highly sensitive to cerebellar GBM compared with supratentorial GBM. 3. Master regulator analysis revealed NR4A1 as a potential therapeutic target in cerebellar GBM.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene FusionGenomicsGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30085274
PMCPMC6303467
OpenAlexW2887309543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.