ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018
Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- The distribution of fitness effects of nonsynonymous mutations varies phylogenetically across animals.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Evidence that genetic drift not adaptation drives fast-Z and large-Z effects in Ficedula flycatchers.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Convergent evolution of noncoding elements associated with short tarsus length in birds.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Role-reversed polyandry is associated with faster fast-Z in shorebirds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Half a Century of Controversy: The Neutralist/Selectionist Debate in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The role of recombination dynamics in shaping signatures of direct and indirect selection across theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Between but Not Within-Species Variation in the Distribution of Fitness Effects.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Base Composition, Codon Usage, and Patterns of Gene Sequence Evolution in Butterflies.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Unusual mammalian usage of TGA stop codons reveals that sequence conservation need not imply purifying selection.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Globally Relaxed Selection and Local Adaptation in Boechera stricta.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Tissue-specific patterns of regulatory changes underlying gene expression differences amongGenome research · 2020Article
- How Much DoesGenetics · 2020Article
- From molecules to populations: appreciating and estimating recombination rate variation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Biased Gene Conversion Constrains Adaptation inGenetics · 2020Article
- Is adaptation limited by mutation? A timescale-dependent effect of genetic diversity on the adaptive substitution rate in animals.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.Genetics · 2019Article
- How Linked Selection Shapes the Diversity Landscape inGenetics · 2019Article
- GC-biased gene conversion conceals the prediction of the nearly neutral theory in avian genomes.Genome biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rate of recombination impacts on rates of protein evolution for at least two reasons: it affects the efficacy of selection due to linkage and influences sequence evolution through the process of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC). We studied how recombination, via gBGC, affects inferences of selection in gene sequences using comparative genomic and population genomic data from the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We separately analyzed different mutation categories ("strong"-to-"weak," "weak-to-strong," and GC-conservative changes) and found that gBGC impacts on the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations, and leads to that the rate of adaptive evolution and the proportion of adaptive mutations among nonsynonymous substitutions are underestimated by 22-33%. It also biases inferences of demographic history based on the site frequency spectrum. In light of this impact, we suggest that inferences of selection (and demography) in lineages with pronounced gBGC should be based on GC-conservative changes only. Doing so, we estimate that 10% of nonsynonymous mutations are effectively neutral and that 27% of nonsynonymous substitutions have been fixed by positive selection in the flycatcher lineage. We also find that gene expression level, sex-bias in expression, and the number of protein-protein interactions, but not Hill-Robertson interference (HRI), are strong determinants of selective constraint and rate of adaptation of collared flycatcher genes. This study therefore illustrates the importance of disentangling the effects of different evolutionary forces and genetic factors in interpretation of sequence data, and from that infer the role of natural selection in DNA sequence evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.