Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30084890›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2018

Analysis of retrotransposon abundance, diversity and distribution in holocentric Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) genomes.

Thaíssa B de Souza, Srinivasa R Chaluvadi, Lucas Johnen, André Marques, M Socorro González-Elizondo, Jeffrey L Bennetzen, André L L Vanzela

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Full-length LTR retroelements in Capsicum annuum revealed a few species-specific family bursts with insertional preferences.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Holocentric Karyotype Evolution inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thaíssa B de SouzaLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Diversity, Department of General Biology, Center for Biological Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Srinivasa R ChaluvadiDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Lucas JohnenLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Diversity, Department of General Biology, Center for Biological Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
André MarquesLaboratory of Genetic Resources, Campus Arapiraca, Federal University of Alagoas, Arapiraca, Brazil.
M Socorro González-ElizondoCIIDIR, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Durango, Mexico.
Jeffrey L BennetzenDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
André L L VanzelaLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Diversity, Department of General Biology, Center for Biological Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversity of Georgia · USInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Long terminal repeat-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) comprise a large portion of plant genomes, with massive repeat blocks distributed across the chromosomes. Eleocharis species have holocentric chromosomes, and show a positive correlation between chromosome numbers and the amount of nuclear DNA. To evaluate the role of LTR-RTs in karyotype diversity in members of Eleocharis (subgenus Eleocharis), the occurrence and location of different members of the Copia and Gypsy superfamilies were compared, covering interspecific variations in ploidy levels (considering chromosome numbers), DNA C-values and chromosomal arrangements. Methods: The DNA C-value was estimated by flow cytometry. Genomes of Eleocharis elegans and E. geniculata were partially sequenced using Illumina MiSeq assemblies, which were a source for searching for conserved proteins of LTR-RTs. POL domains were used for recognition, comparing families and for probe production, considering different families of Copia and Gypsy superfamilies. Probes were obtained by PCR and used in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) against chromosomes of seven Eleocharis species. Key Results: A positive correlation between ploidy levels and the amount of nuclear DNA was observed, but with significant variations between samples with the same ploidy levels, associated with repetitive DNA fractions. LTR-RTs were abundant in E. elegans and E. geniculata genomes, with a predominance of Copia Sirevirus and Gypsy Athila/Tat clades. FISH using LTR-RT probes exhibited scattered and clustered signals, but with differences in the chromosomal locations of Copia and Gypsy. The diversity in LTR-RT locations suggests that there is no typical chromosomal distribution pattern for retrotransposons in holocentric chromosomes, except the CRM family with signals distributed along chromatids. Conclusions: These data indicate independent fates for each LTR-RT family, including accumulation between and within chromosomes and genomes. Differential activity and small changes in LTR-RTs suggest a secondary role in nuclear DNA variation, when compared with ploidy changes.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationChromosomes, PlantEleocharisFlow CytometryGenome, PlantGenome SizeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePloidiesRetroelementsSpecies SpecificityTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID30084890
PMCPMC6070107
OpenAlexW2801135317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.