Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30084741›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2019

Testing a Multivariate Proteomic Panel for Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarker Discovery: A TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.

J Russell Huie, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, John K Yue, Marco D Sorani, Ava M Puccio, David O Okonkwo, Geoffrey T Manley, Adam R Ferguson, TRACK-TBI Investigators

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Research Focus of RNA-Binding Proteins in Trauma and Burns.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J Russell Huie1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia3 Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John K Yue1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Marco D Sorani2 Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ava M Puccio4 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David O Okonkwo5 Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Geoffrey T Manley1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Adam R Ferguson1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
TRACK-TBI Investigators
San Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain InjuryU01NS086090 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAZ-ARRASTIA, RAMON, GIACINO, JOSEPH THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
Transforming Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical CareRC2NS069409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2009 to 2011
$4.3M
Maladaptive Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury: Cellular MechanismsR01NS088475 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERGUSON, ADAM R · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Translational Outcomes Project: Visualizing Syndromic Information and Outcomes for Neurotrauma (TOP-VISION)UH3NS106899 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BEATTIE, MICHAEL S, BRESNAHAN, JACQUELINE C · 2020 to 2022
$1.2M
Translational Outcomes Project: Visualizing Syndromic Information and Outcomes for Neurotrauma (TOP-VISION)UG3NS106899 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BEATTIE, MICHAEL S, BRESNAHAN, JACQUELINE C · 2018 to 2019
$480k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088475NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069409NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS086090NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS106899NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS106899RRD VA I01 RX002787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex and heterogeneous nature of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has rendered the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers elusive. A single acute biomarker may not be sufficient to categorize injury severity and/or predict outcome. Using multivariate dimension reduction analyses, we tested the sensitivity and specificity of a multi-analyte panel of proteins as an ensemble biomarker for TBI. Serum was collected within 24 h of injury in a cohort of 130 patients enrolled in the multi-center prospective Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Pilot (TRACK-TBI Pilot) study and run on an array that measured 72 proteins. Using unsupervised principal components analysis, we first identified the subset of protein changes accounting for the most variance across patients. This yielded a group of 21 proteins that reflected an inverse relationship between inflammatory cytokines and regulators of anti-inflammation, and generated an individual inflammatory profile score for each patient. We then tested the association between these scores and computed tomography (CT) findings at hospital admission, as well as their prognostic association with functional recovery at 3 and 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended), and cognitive recovery at 6 months (California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition) after injury. Inflammatory signatures were significantly increased in patients with positive CT findings, as well as in those who showed poor or incomplete recovery. Inflammation biomarker scores also showed significant sensitivity and specificity as a discriminator of these outcome measures (all areas under the curve [AUCs] >0.62). This proof of concept for the feasibility of multivariate biomarker identification demonstrates the prognostic validity of using a proteomic panel as a potential biomarker for TBI.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProteomicsYoung AdultBiomarkersbiomarkersproteomicsTBI

Identifiers

PMID30084741
PMCPMC6306686
OpenAlexW2886296499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.