Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30084698›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2018

Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis.

Kirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, Lauren Carlson, Peter Rohloff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Recent Trends in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Tanzania.The East African health research journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of the SIRT3-AMPK/PPAR pathway on invasion and migration of cervical cancer cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsten AustadKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Anita CharyKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Sandy Mux XocopKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Sarah MessmerKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Nora KingKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Lauren CarlsonKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.
Peter RohloffKirsten Austad, Anita Chary, Sandy Mux Xocop, Sarah Messmer, Nora King, and Peter Rohloff, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala; Kirsten Austad, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Lauren Carlson, Mayo Medical School, Minnesota Campus, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Cervical cancer is an important cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Although screening technologies continue to improve, systems of care remain fragmented. It is important to better understand factors that affect use of screening services and loss to follow-up along the care continuum. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study of a cytology-based screening program in rural Guatemala. A retrospective electronic chart review was performed on data from all patients from 2013 to 2014. We analyzed progression through care and calculated loss-to-follow-up rates. We also analyzed the prior experiences of patients with cervical cancer screening on the basis of self-reported historical data available in the chart review. Structured interviews with a subset of individuals to explore social supports and barriers to screening and engagement in care were conducted at the time of screening. Results The analysis included 515 women (median age, 36 years). Cytologic screening showed concern for neoplastic changes in 0.83%; half resulted in biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. An additional 9.9% showed severe inflammation. The rate of loss to follow-up was 11.3%. All losses to follow-up occurred for severe inflammation, not for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Historical data showed that 73% of the cohort had previously been screened and had high levels of loss to follow-up (57.4%). Qualitative interviews revealed factors that promoted loss to follow-up; these included cost, lack of social supports, transportation, distrust in public facilities, long turn-around times, and failure to return test results or offer follow-up treatments. Conclusions Taken together, these quantitative and qualitative results highlight the need for cervical cancer screening programs in Guatemala to improve uptake of screening services by eligible women and to improve follow-up after a first abnormal screen.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuatemalaHumansRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30084698
PMCPMC6223515
OpenAlexW2808068779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.