Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30084394›Full record

ReviewActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2018

Spin ballet for sweet encounters: saturation-transfer difference NMR and X-ray crystallography complement each other in the elucidation of protein-glycan interactions.

Bärbel S Blaum, Ursula Neu, Thomas Peters, Thilo Stehle

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virus-Glycan Interactions Studied by Solute NMR.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Three-Dimensional Structures of Carbohydrates and Where to Find Them.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glycan structures and their interactions with proteins. A NMR view.Current opinion in structural biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quo vadis, Acta Crystallographica F?Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018
    Article
  14. Carbohydrate structure hits the groove.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bärbel S BlaumInterfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ursula NeuDepartment of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424 Potsdam, Germany.
Thomas PetersInstitute of Chemistry and Metabolomics, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Thilo StehleInterfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

SYNTHETIC CHEMISTRY COREP01NS065719 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GEE, GRETCHEN VOGEL · 2009 to 2018
$12.3M
NIH HHS NIH-P01 NS 065719NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS065719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular NMR spectroscopy has limitations in the determination of protein structures: an inherent size limit and the requirement for expensive and potentially difficult isotope labelling pose considerable hurdles. Therefore, structural analysis of larger proteins is almost exclusively performed by crystallography. However, the diversity of biological NMR applications outperforms that of any other structural biology technique. For the characterization of transient complexes formed by proteins and small ligands, notably oligosaccharides, one NMR technique has recently proven to be particularly powerful: saturation-transfer difference NMR (STD-NMR) spectroscopy. STD-NMR experiments are fast and simple to set up, with no general protein size limit and no requirement for isotope labelling. The method performs best in the moderate-to-low affinity range that is of interest in most of glycobiology. With small amounts of unlabelled protein, STD-NMR experiments can identify hits from mixtures of potential ligands, characterize mutant proteins and pinpoint binding epitopes on the ligand side. STD-NMR can thus be employed to complement and improve protein-ligand complex models obtained by other structural biology techniques or by purely computational means. With a set of protein-glycan interactions from our own work, this review provides an introduction to the technique for structural biologists. It exemplifies how crystallography and STD-NMR can be combined to elucidate protein-glycan (and other protein-ligand) interactions in atomic detail, and how the technique can extend structural biology from simplified systems amenable to crystallization to more complex biological entities such as membranes, live viruses or entire cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCrystallography, X-RayHumansLectinsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPolyomavirusPolysaccharidesProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryLectinsPolysaccharidescarbohydrateslectinspolyomavirussaturation-transfer difference NMRSTD-NMRstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID30084394
PMCPMC6096479
OpenAlexW2883093758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.