Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30084190›Full record

ReviewSeminars in dialysis2018

Blood pressure control in conventional hemodialysis.

Panagiotis I Georgianos, Rajiv Agarwal

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in dialysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Panagiotis I GeorgianosDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Rajiv AgarwalDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
AHEPA University Hospital · GRIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Hypertension in Hemodialysis PatientsR01DK062030 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI AGARWAL, RAJIV · 2003 to 2013
$3.8M
ChLorthalidone In Chronic Kidney Disease (CLICK) StudyR01HL126903 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI AGARWAL, RAJIV · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Masked Hypertension in Chronic Kidney DiseaseI01CX000829 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI AGARWAL, RAJIV · 2013 to 2016
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000829NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126903NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension among patients on hemodialysis is common, difficult to diagnose and often inadequately controlled. Although specific blood pressure (BP) targets in this particular population are not yet established, meta-analyses of randomized trials showed that deliberate BP-lowering with antihypertensive drugs improves clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients. BP-lowering in these individuals should initially utilize nonpharmacological strategies aiming to control sodium and volume overload. Accordingly, restricting dietary sodium intake, eliminating intradialytic sodium gain via individualized dialysate sodium prescription, optimally assessing and managing dry-weight and providing a sufficient duration of dialysis are first-line treatment considerations to control BP. If BP remains uncontrolled despite the adequate management of volume, antihypertensive therapy is the next consideration. Contrary to nonhemodialysis populations, emerging clinical-trial evidence suggests that among those on hemodialysis, β-blockers are more effective than agents blocking the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) in reducing BP levels and protecting from serious adverse cardiovascular complications. Accordingly, β-blockade is our first-line approach in pharmacotherapy of hypertension. Long-acting calcium-channel-blockers and RAS-blockers are our next considerations, taking into account the comorbidities and the overall risk profile of each individual patient. Additional research efforts, mainly randomized trials, are clearly warranted in order to elucidate aspects of management that remain elusive in hypertensive dialysis patients.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDiet, Sodium-RestrictedHumansHypertensionKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsBP controlESRDhemodialysishypertensiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID30084190
PMCPMC6218270
OpenAlexW2887974438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.