ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2019
Bladder augmentation in children: current problems and experimental strategies for reconstruction.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and urodynamic findings in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder undergoing augmentation cystoplasty: a systematic review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Pooled it
- OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2021Trial
- Complications after augmentation enterocystoplasty in children.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Integrated 'Shield-Spear' Biological Patch for Fibrosis-Free Bladder Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Bladder patch repair using mesothelial Cell-Seeded autologous granulation tissue: an experimental study in male rabbits.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- An updated review of stone management in patients with bladder exstrophy.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcomas of the Genitourinary Tract.Cancers · 2023Review
- [Renal transplantation in urinary diversions].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Review
- Bladder Augmentation Using LyoplantTissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder augmentation is a demanding surgical procedure and exclusively offered for selected children and has only a small spectrum of indications. Paediatric bladder voiding dysfunction occurs either on a basis of neurological dysfunction caused by congenital neural tube defects or on a basis of rare congenital anatomic malformations. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction often responds well to a combination of specific drugs and/or intermittent self-catheterization. However, selected patients with spinal dysraphism and children with congenital malformations like bladder exstrophy and resulting small bladder capacity might require bladder augmentation. Ileocystoplasty is the preferred method of bladder augmentation to date. Because of the substantial long-and short-term morbidity of augmentation cystoplasty, recent studies have tried to incorporate new techniques and technologies, such as the use of biomaterials to overcome or reduce the adverse effects. In this regard, homografts and allografts have been implemented in bladder augmentation with varying results, but recent studies have shown promising data in terms of proliferation of urothelium and muscle cells by using biological silk grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.