ArticleImmunologic research2018
MHC II deficient infant identified by newborn screening program for SCID.
Article in Immunologic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical, immunological, treatment characteristics, and outcomes in 22 patients with major histocompatibility complex class II deficiency.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- TREC and KREC profiling as a representative of thymus and bone marrow output in patients with various inborn errors of immunity.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2020Article
- A novel mutation in RFXANK gene and low B cell count in a patient with MHC class II deficiency: a case report.Immunologic research · 2020Article
- Immune dysregulation in patients with RAG deficiency and other forms of combined immune deficiency.Blood · 2020Review
- Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for MHC Class II Deficiency.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) programs for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), using the TREC-based assay, have enabled early diagnosis, prompt treatment, and eventually changed the natural history of affected infants. Nevertheless, it was believed that some affected infants with residual T cell, such as patients with MHC II deficiency, will be misdiagnosed by this assay. A full immune workup and genetic analysis using direct Sanger sequencing and whole exome sequencing have been performed to a patient that was identified by the Israeli NBS program for SCID. The patient was found to have severe CD4 lymphopenia with an inverted CD4/CD8 ratio, low TREC levels in peripheral blood, abnormal response to mitogen stimulation, and a skewed T cell receptor repertoire. HLA-DR expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes was undetectable suggesting a diagnosis of MHC II deficiency. Direct sequencing of the RFX5 gene revealed a stop codon change (p. R239X, c. C715T), which could cause the patient's immune phenotype. His parents were found to be heterozygote carriers for the mutation. Whole exome sequencing could not identify other potential mutations to explain his immunodeficiency. The patient underwent successful conditioned hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from healthy matched unrelated donor and is currently well and alive with full chimerism. Infants with MHC class II deficiency can potentially be identified by the TREC-based assay NBS for SCID. Therefore, MHC II molecules (e.g., HLA-DR) measurement should be part of the confirmatory immune-phenotyping for patients with positive screening results. This will make the diagnosis of such patients straightforward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.