Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083981›Full record

ArticleActa diabetologica2018

Measuring visual cortical oxygenation in diabetes using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Ross T Aitchison, Laura Ward, Graeme J Kennedy, Xinhua Shu, David C Mansfield, Uma Shahani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta diabetologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sub-clinical thickening of the fovea in diabetes and its relationship to glycaemic control: a study using swept-source optical coherence tomography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ross T AitchisonSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. ross.aitchison@gcu.ac.uk.
Laura WardInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Graeme J KennedySchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Xinhua ShuSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
David C MansfieldDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, UK.
Uma ShahaniSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBInverclyde Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDiabetes mellitus affects about 6% of the world's population, and the chronic complications of the disease may result in macro- and micro-vascular changes. The purpose of the current study was to shed light on visual cortical oxygenation in diabetic individuals. We then aimed to compare the haemodynamic response (HDR) to visual stimulation with glycaemic control, given the likelihood of diabetic individuals suffering from such macro- and micro-vascular insult. METHODOLOGY: Thirty participants took part in this explorative study, fifteen of whom had diabetes and fifteen of whom were non-diabetic controls. The HDR, measured as concentrations of oxyhaemoglobin [HbO] and deoxyhaemoglobin [HbR], to visual stimulation was recorded over the primary visual cortex (V1) using a dual-channel oximeter. The stimulus comprised a pattern-reversal checkerboard presented in a block design. Participants' mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA

resultsThere were statistically significant differences in ∆[HbO] and ∆[HbR] to visual stimulation between diabetic and non-diabetic groups (p < 0.05). In the diabetic group, individuals with type 1 diabetes displayed an increased [HbO] (p < 0.01) and decreased [HbR] (p < 0.05) compared to their type 2 counterparts. There was also a linear relationship between both ∆[HbO] and ∆[HbR] as a function of HbA

conclusionsOur findings suggest that fNIRS can be used as a quantitative measure of cortical oxygenation in diabetes. Diabetic individuals have a larger HDR to visual stimulation compared to non-diabetic individuals. This increase in ∆[HbO] and decrease in ∆[HbR] appears to be correlated with HbA

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOximetrySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredVisual CortexAutonomic dysfunctionDiabetesFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyHaemodynamic responseVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30083981
PMCPMC6182359
OpenAlexW2885026379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.