Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083961›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2019

Global trends in the distribution of cancer types among patients in oncology phase I trials, 1991-2015.

Kota Itahashi, Toshio Shimizu, Takafumi Koyama, Shunsuke Kondo, Yutaka Fujiwara, Noboru Yamamoto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kota ItahashiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Toshio ShimizuDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yutaka FujiwaraDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. nbryamam@ncc.go.jp.
National Cancer Centre Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Systematic analyses regarding cancer types of patients enrolled in oncology phase I trials are scarce. The global distribution, time-dependent change, and regional differences were evaluated. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed database, in which all single-agent phase I trials permitting the enrollment of all-comer patients with any type of solid tumor published between January 1991 and December 2015 were specified, was performed. Trials expected to enroll specific patient populations were excluded according to predefined criteria. Results Eight hundred and sixty-six eligible trials, which had enrolled 29,112 advanced solid tumor patients, were identified. Colorectal (n = 7510; 25.8%) and lung cancer (n = 3212; 11.0%) were the most prevalent solid tumors, followed by sarcoma (n = 1756; 6.0%), breast cancer (n = 1623; 5.6%), and renal cancer (n = 1589; 5.5%). The proportion of patients with either colorectal or lung cancer tended to decrease over time. The proportion of trials, in which patients with either of these two cancers accounted for ≥50.0% of the total number of patients in each trial, also decreased: 33 of 67 trials (31/67) (46.3%) in 1991-1995, 58/142 (40.8%) in 1996-2000, 59/223 (26.5%) in 2001-2005, 38/189 (20.1%) in 2006-2010, and 41/245 (16.7%) in 2011-2015. Instead, the proportion of patients with various types of cancer increased, leading to diversification of enrolled patients. Conclusions The distribution of cancer types among patients in phase I trials has changed. The comprehensive review of the distribution of solid tumor types could contribute to flexible trial designs and optimal patient recruitment.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicGlobal HealthHumansNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationCancerCancer typeGlobal trendPhase I trial

Identifiers

PMID30083961
OpenAlexW2885635591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.