Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083956›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2019

Bipolar disorder in the balance.

Brian J Lithgow, Zahra Moussavi, Caroline Gurvich, Jayashri Kulkarni, Jerome J Maller, Paul B Fitzgerald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian J LithgowMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Brian.Lithgow@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4631-9485
Zahra MoussaviDiagnostic and Neurosignal Processing Research Laboratory, Riverview Health Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Caroline GurvichMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jayashri KulkarniMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jerome J MallerMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul B FitzgeraldMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP0669420National Health and Medical Research Council 1078567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mood disorder that lacks established electrophysiological, neuroimaging or biological markers to assist with both diagnosis and monitoring disease severity. This study's aim is to describe the potential of new neurophysiological features assistive in BD diagnosis and severity measurement utilizing the recording of electrical activity from the outer ear canal called Electrovestibulography (EVestG). From EVestG data sensory vestibulo-acoustic features were extracted from a single supine-vertical translation stimulus to distinguish 50 depressed and partly remitted/remitted bipolar disorder patients [18 symptomatic (BD-S, MADRS > 19), 32 reduced symptomatic (BD-R, MADRS ≤ 19)] and 31 age and gender matched healthy individuals (controls). Six features were extracted from the measured firing pattern interval histogram and the extracted shape of the average field potential response. Five of the six features had low but significant correlations (p < 0.05) with the MADRS assessment. Using leave-one-out-cross-validation, unbiased parametric and non-parametric classification routines resulted in 75-79%, 84-86%, 76-85% and 79-82% accuracy for separation of control from BD, BD-S and BD-R as well as BD-S from BD-R groups, respectively. The main limitation of this study was the inability to fully disentangle the impact of prescribed medication from the responses recorded. A mix of stationary and movement evoked EVestG features produced good discrimination between control and BD patients whether BD-S or BD-R. Moreover, BD-S and BD-R appear to have measurably different pathophysiological manifestations. The firing pattern features used were dissimilar to those observed in a prior major depressive disorder study.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAdultBipolar DisorderEar, ExternalElectrodiagnosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionReproducibility of ResultsVestibular NucleiVestibule, LabyrinthBiological markersBipolar disorderDepressionElectrovestibulographyNeurobiologyVestibular

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.