Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083954›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2018

Compromised tDCS-induced facilitation of motor consolidation in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Jost-Julian Rumpf, Sophie Dietrich, Muriel Stoppe, Christopher Fricke, David Weise, Florian Then Bergh, Joseph Classen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Does M1 anodal transcranial direct current stimulation affects online and offline motor learning in patients with multiple sclerosis?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jost-Julian RumpfDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. jost-julian.rumpf@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-713X
Sophie DietrichDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Muriel StoppeDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Christopher FrickeDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
David WeiseDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian Then BerghDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Joseph ClassenDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. joseph.classen@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether consolidation after motor learning can be facilitated by offline (post-training) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsIn this cross-sectional double-blind interventional study, effects of tDCS on motor consolidation were examined in 14 patients with relapsing remitting MS [median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 2.0 (range 1-4)] and 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. tDCS with the anode placed over the left primary motor cortex and the cathode placed over the right supraorbital region was applied immediately after a training session of an explicit sequential finger-tapping task that was performed with the right (dominant) hand. Task performance was retested after an interval of 8 h to assess consolidation. Participants took part in two experimental sessions separated by at least 7 days which differed with respect to type of post-training tDCS, i.e., sham and verum stimulation.

resultsPatients with MS performed worse than controls in functional motor tests and the motor sequence task. However, learning speed and magnitude of online performance increments during the training session were comparable to controls. While post-training tDCS facilitated motor consolidation in controls, patients with MS did not benefit from this type of intervention.

conclusionAbsence of post-training tDCS-induced facilitation of consolidation in patients with MS suggests that the interaction of tDCS with the motor consolidation network is inefficient. Identification of the underlying disease-related mechanisms will have important implications for the design of studies aiming to promote motor recovery in MS by non-invasive brain stimulation.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFingersHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMotor SkillsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingYoung AdultMotor consolidationMotor learningMultiple sclerosisTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.