ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019
[Online information for relatives of critically ill patients : Pilot test of the usability of an ICU families website].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of digital communication tools on patients, family members and health care professionals in adult ICUs: a mixed-methods systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of an online information tool on post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ICU-Families-Study).Intensive care medicine · 2023Trial
- Digital Tools for Information, Communication, Support, and Family Engagement in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- One Website to Gather them All: Usability Testing of the New German SKin Cancer INFOrmation (SKINFO) Website-A Mixed-methods Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Does an educational website improve psychological outcomes and satisfaction among family members of intensive care unit patients?Critical care science · 2023Article
- Practice of family-centred care in intensive care units before the COVID-19-pandemic: A cross-sectional analysis in German-speaking countries.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelatives of intensive care patients have a very high need for information. This is due to the acute and serious, often life-threatening illness of the patients and the very complex and technical environment of an intensive care unit (ICU). Unmet needs for information can increase anxiety, sleep disorders, stress, and depressive symptoms in the relatives.
objectivesThe potential of the ICU families website in terms of usability and functionality during real-time testing were evaluated.
methodsThe ICU families project created a dynamic online information platform in the form of a password-protected website. It contains pictures, written explanations, 5 movies, a forum and a diary function. The usability of the website was tested among 10 lay people and 10 experts (7 nurses and 3 physicians) according to the Think Aloud Method.
resultsThe outcome is qualitative feedback based on video documentation by laypeople and suggestions by experts. Criticisms mentioned by the test subjects were insufficient image material, small size of the operator contact link and lack of a home button. With a mean of 9.1 (rating scale, 0 = very poor, 10 = very good), the website was almost universally recommended by the experts.
conclusionsThis usability test of a website for relatives of ICU patients conducted among 20 test subjects showed the biggest challenges related to solving individual test scenarios and provided valuable hints for improving website usability. Features of the website highlighted as positive were the clear layout, the symbols, the diary and the consideration of children. This information was used to improve the site for subsequent roll-out in a randomized, controlled and multicentre study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.