Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083852›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2020

Advances in gene therapy for hemophilia: basis, current status, and future perspectives.

Tsukasa Ohmori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Review
  14. Therapeutic Applications of the CRISPR-Cas System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Viral vector-based gene therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. CRISPR/Cas9-MediatedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tsukasa OhmoriDepartment of Biochemistry, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3111-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. tohmori@jichi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-6394

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18fk0410017h0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemophilia is a congenital hemorrhagic disease caused by genetic abnormalities in coagulation factor VIII or factor IX. Current conventional therapy to prevent bleeding requires frequent intravenous injections of coagulation factor concentrates from early childhood. Accordingly, gene therapy for hemophilia remains an exciting future prospect for patients and their families, due to its potential to cure the disease through a one-time treatment. After a series of successes in basic research, recent clinical trials have demonstrated clear efficacy of gene therapy for hemophilia using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors. Although this is likely to alter the paradigm of hemophilia care in the near future, it will be important to overcome immune responses against AAV. Gene therapy for hemophilia cannot be given to patients with anti-AAV capsid-neutralizing antibodies, and cellular immunity with CD8

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChildDependovirusFactor IXFactor VIIIGene EditingGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHemophilia AHemophilia BHemorrhageHumansF8 protein, humanFactor IXFactor VIIIAdeno-associated virus vectorGene therapyHemophilia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.