ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018
Role of transanal irrigation in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05007015 (Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Multicenter Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transanal irrigation is effective for low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of retrograde and antegrade enemas in the management of low anterior resection syndrome in patients undergoing rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal interventions for low anterior resection syndrome: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the management options available for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Consensus-driven protocol for transanal irrigation in patients with low anterior resection syndrome and functional constipation.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Guideline
- Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between da Vinci Robotic and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- The efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Pooled it
- Transanal irrigation for low anterior resection syndrome treatment: international multicentre randomized clinical trial.BJS open · 2026Trial
- Early transanal irrigation in spinal cord injury-related neurogenic bowel dysfunction: preliminary insights.Spinal cord series and cases · 2026Trial
- Effects of stoma discharge reinfusion on low anterior resection syndrome and the gut microbiota following sphincter-preserving surgery for middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial.Updates in surgery · 2026Trial
- Low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection management: multicentre randomized clinical trial of transanal irrigation with a dedicated device (cone catheter) versus conservative bowel management.The British journal of surgery · 2023Trial
- "Prophylactic" transanal irrigation (TAI) to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection: results at 12-month follow-up of a controlled randomized multicenter trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Transanal irrigation in clinical practice: a scoping review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery: mechanisms, assessment, management, and the potential role of robotic surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Evaluation and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition).Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of transanal irrigation in low anterior resection syndrome.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of transanal irrigation in patients with low anterior resection syndrome: what happens after more than five years?International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransanal irrigation(TAI) has been reported to be an inexpensive and effective treatment for low anterior resection syndrome(LARS). The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the use of TAI in patients with significant LARS symptoms at a single medical center.
methodsPatients who had low anterior resection for rectal cancer between April 2015 and May 2016 at the Careggi University Hospital were assessed for LARS using the LARS and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC BFI) questionnaires 30-40 days after surgery or ileostomy closure (if this was done). Quality of life was evaluated using a visual analog scale and the Short Form-36 Health Survey. All patients with LARS score of 30 or higher were included (early LARS) as were all patients with a LARS score of 30 or higher referred 6 months or longer after surgery performed elsewhere (chronic LARS) in the same study period. Study participants were trained to perform TAI using the Peristeen™ System for 6 months, followed by 3 months of enema therapy following a similar protocol.
resultsThirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Six patients stopped the treatment. The 27 patients (19 early LARS and 8 chronic LARS) who completed the study had a significant decrease in the number of median daily bowel movements [baseline 7 (range 0-14); 6 months 1 (range 0-4); 9 months 4 (range 0-13)]. The median LARS Score fell from 35.1 (range 30-42) (baseline) to 12.2 (range 0-21) after 6 months (p < 0.0001) and then rose to 27 (range 5-39) after 3 months of enema therapy. There was no difference in LARS score decrease at 6 months between the patients with early and chronic LARS (22.5 and 23.9 respectively; p=0.7) and there were no predictors of score decrease. Four components of the SF-36 significantly improved during the TAI period. The MSKCC BFI score significantly improved in several domains. Twenty-three patients (85%) asked to continue the treatment with TAI after the study ended.
conclusionsTAI appears to be an effective treatment for LARS and results in a marked improvement of continence and quality of life. Patients may be assessed and treated for LARS early after surgery since the treatment benefit is similar to that observed in patients with LARS diagnosed 6 months or longer after surgery. The potential rehabilitative role of TAI for LARS is promising and should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.