Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083752›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2018

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gloria D Coronado, Amanda F Petrik, William M Vollmer, Stephen H Taplin, Erin M Keast, Scott Fields, Beverly B Green

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01742065 (Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01742065 nacompletednot on this map

Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2013 to 2018Enrolled62,155ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsAuto Plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
William M VollmerKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Stephen H TaplinCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Erin M KeastKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Scott FieldsOCHIN, Portland, Oregon.
Beverly B GreenKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority PopulationsUH3CA188640 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2014 to 2017
$6.1M
Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority PopulationsUH2AT007782 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2012 to 2013
$859k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT007782NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA188640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015). Interventions: Electronic health record-embedded tools to identify eligible adults and to facilitate implementation of a stepwise mailed intervention involving (1) an introductory letter, (2) a mailed FIT, and (3) a reminder letter; training, collaborative learning, and facilitation through a practice improvement process. Main Outcomes and Measures: Effectiveness was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who completed a FIT, and secondarily, any colorectal cancer screening within 12 months of accrual or by August 3, 2015. Implementation was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who were mailed an introductory letter and ordered a FIT. Results: Twenty-six clinics with 41 193 adults (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [6.3] years; 22 994 women) were randomized to receive the direct mail colorectal screening intervention (13 clinics; 21 134 patients) or usual care (13 clinics; 20 059 patients). Compared with usual care clinics, intervention clinics had significantly higher adjusted clinic-level proportion of participants who completed a FIT (13.9% vs 10.4%; difference, 3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.8%) and any colorectal cancer screening (18.3% vs 14.5%; difference, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.6%-7.0%). We observed large variation across health centers in effectiveness (FIT completion differences range, -7.4 percentage points to 17.6 percentage points) and implementation (proportion who were mailed a FIT range, 6.5% to 68.2%). The number needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT was 4.8 overall, and 4.0 in clinics that mailed a FIT reminder. Conclusions and Relevance: An EHR-embedded mailed FIT outreach intervention significantly improved rates of FIT completion and rates of any colorectal cancer screening. Higher rates of colorectal cancer screening occurred in clinics that successfully implemented the mailed outreach program. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01742065.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationPublic HealthAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity-Institutional RelationsEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMorbidityPostal Service

Identifiers

PMID30083752
PMCPMC6142956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.