Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083701›Full record

SynthesisJAMA internal medicine2018

Association of Endometrial Cancer Risk With Postmenopausal Bleeding in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Megan A Clarke, Beverly J Long, Arena Del Mar Morillo, Marc Arbyn, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Nicolas Wentzensen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 203 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04995731 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Risk Assessment of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: Development and Validation of Clinical-ultrasound Based Scoring System(A Cross Sectional -Validation Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled328ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsInformation about clinical risk factors for endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia (EH), transvaginal ultrasound examination
NCT06192017 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Molecular Diagnostic Tool for Endometrial Cancer.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMiMARK Diagnostics, S.L.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled1,950ConditionsEndometrium CancerArmsWomEC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Prognostic Value of 16α-Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A DNA methylation assay (MPap) using self-collected tampon versus cytology collection swab for endometrial cancer detection.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan A ClarkeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Beverly J LongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Arena Del Mar MorilloDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Jamie N Bakkum-GamezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicolas WentzensenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsMayo Clinic · USNational Cancer Institute · USSciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: As the worldwide burden of endometrial cancer continues to rise, interest is growing in the evaluation of early detection and prevention strategies among women at increased risk. Focusing efforts on women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), a common symptom of endometrial cancer, may be a useful strategy; however, PMB is not specific for endometrial cancer and is often caused by benign conditions. Objective: To provide a reference of the prevalence of PMB in endometrial cancers and the risk of endometrial cancer in women with PMB. Data Sources: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language studies published January 1, 1977, through January 31, 2017. Study Selection: Observational studies reporting the prevalence of PMB in women with endometrial cancer and the risk of endometrial cancer in women with PMB in unselected populations were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers evaluated study quality and risk of bias using items from the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Studies that included highly selected populations, lacked detailed inclusion criteria, and/or included 25 or fewer women were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The pooled prevalence of PMB in women with endometrial cancer and the risk of endometrial cancer in women with PMB. Results: A total of 129 unique studies, including 34 432 unique patients with PMB and 6358 with endometrial cancer (40 790 women), were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of PMB among women with endometrial cancer was 91% (95% CI, 87%-93%), irrespective of tumor stage. The pooled risk of endometrial cancer among women with PMB was 9% (95% CI, 8%-11%), with estimates varying by use of hormone therapy (range, 7% [95% CI, 6%-9%] to 12% [95% CI, 9%-15%]; P < .001 for heterogeneity) and geographic region (range, 5% [95% CI, 3%-11%] in North America to 13% [95% CI, 9%-19%] in Western Europe; P = .09 for heterogeneity). Conclusions and Relevance: Early detection strategies focused on women with PMB have the potential to capture as many as 90% of endometrial cancers; however, most women with PMB will not be diagnosed with endometrial cancer. These results can aid in the assessment of the potential clinical value of new early detection markers and clinical management strategies for endometrial cancer and will help to inform clinical and epidemiologic risk prediction models to support decision making.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseBiopsyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsUterine Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID30083701
PMCPMC6142981
OpenAlexW2885550086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.