Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083495›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in psychiatry2018

Financing for Collaborative Care - A Narrative Review.

Andrew D Carlo, Jürgen Unützer, Anna D H Ratzliff, Joseph M Cerimele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Financial Sustainability of Novel Delivery Models in Behavioral Health Treatment.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Canons of Collaborative Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D CarloUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences - 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Room BB1644, Seattle, WA 98195-6560.
Jürgen UnützerUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences - 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Room BB1644, Seattle, WA 98195-6560.
Anna D H RatzliffUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences - 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Room BB1644, Seattle, WA 98195-6560.
Joseph M CerimeleUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences - 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Room BB1644, Seattle, WA 98195-6560.

Funding

Psychiatry Primary Care NRSA T-32 AwardT32MH020021 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN C. FORTNEY, JURGEN UNUTZER · 1998 to 2026
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCollaborative care (CoCM) is an evidence-based model for the treatment of common mental health conditions in the primary care setting. Its workflow encourages systematic communication among clinicians outside of face-to-face patient encounters, which has posed financial challenges in traditional fee-for-service reimbursement environments. RECENT

findingsOrganizations have employed various financing strategies to promote CoCM sustainability, including external grants, alternate payment model contracts with specific payers and the use of billing codes for individual components of CoCM. In recent years, Medicare approved fee-for-service, time-based billing codes for CoCM that allow for the reimbursement of patient care performed outside of face-to-face encounters. A growing number of Medicaid and commercial payers have followed suit, either recognizing the fee-for-service codes or contracting to reimburse in alternate payment models. SUMMARY: Although significant challenges remain, novel methods for payment and cooperative efforts among insurers have helped move CoCM closer to financial sustainability.

Indexed as

Collaborative careFinancial sustainabilityHealthcare financingHealth PolicyHealth service reimbursement

Identifiers

PMID30083495
PMCPMC6075691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.