Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083483›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

piRNN: deep learning algorithm for piRNA prediction.

Kai Wang, Joshua Hoeksema, Chun Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Computational Methods and Online Resources for Identification of piRNA-Related Molecules.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai WangDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Joshua HoeksemaDepartment of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Chun LiangDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are the largest class of small non-coding RNAs discovered in germ cells. Identifying piRNAs from small RNA data is a challenging task due to the lack of conserved sequences and structural features of piRNAs. Many programs have been developed to identify piRNA from small RNA data. However, these programs have limitations. They either rely on extracting complicated features, or only demonstrate strong performance on transposon related piRNAs. Here we proposed a new program called piRNN for piRNA identification. For our software, we applied a convolutional neural network classifier that was trained on the datasets from four different species (

Indexed as

Convolution neural networkDeep learningpiRNA

Identifiers

PMID30083483
PMCPMC6078063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.