Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083382›Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2018

Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence.

Maxine Johnson, Matthew Day, Rajesh Moholkar, Paul Gilluley, Elizabeth Goyder

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maxine JohnsonResearch Fellow, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Matthew DayConsultant in Public Health for Specialised Commissioning, Public Health England, UK.
Rajesh MoholkarConsultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Reaside Clinic, and Lecturer, School of Psychology, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK.
Paul GilluleyConsultant Forensic Psychiatrist and Head of Forensic Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderProfessor of Public Health, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence and incidence of obesity are high in people with severe mental illness (SMI). In England, around 6000 people with SMI access care from secure mental health units. There is currently no specific guidance on how to reduce the risk of obesity-related morbidity and mortality in this population.

aimsTo identify international evidence that addresses the issue of obesity in mental health secure units.

methodA mixed method review of evidence (published 2000-2015) was carried out to assess obesity prevalence, intervention and policy change, as well as barriers to change.

resultsEvidence from 22 mainly small, non-comparator studies (reported in 21 papers) using a range of methods was reviewed. Dietary, physical activity and cultural interventions being implemented within secure units to address the problem of obesity showed some promising outcomes for physical health and health education. These were facilitated by adequate organisational resources, staff training and motivated staff. Holistic interventions that included a social and/or competitive element were more likely to be taken up. Involving patients in decision-making mediated the tension between facilitating behaviour change and imposing control. Barriers to successful outcomes included patient movement in and out of units, severity of mental health condition and resistance to change by patients and staff.

conclusionsDespite the promising outcomes reported, further assessment is needed of the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of interventions and policies targeting the obesogenic environment, using robust research methods. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Forensic mental health servicespatientsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID30083382
PMCPMC6066985
OpenAlexW2884061062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.