ArticlePorcine health management2018
Clinical efficacy of two vaccination strategies against
Article in Porcine health management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Field Trial Demonstrates Superiority of a Live Attenuated Vaccine for Integrated Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Non-Compromised Efficacy of the First Commercial Ready-to-Use Genotype 2d Porcine Circovirus Type 2 andViruses · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of intradermal vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under combined exposure field conditions.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Relationships between pig farm management and facilities and lung lesions' scores and between lung lesions scores and carcass characteristics.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Long-term follow-up of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-specific immunity in vaccinated pigs.Veterinary research · 2023Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Two Novel, Differentially Administered (IM, ID) Vaccines againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Vaccination Program againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Development of an indirect ELISA for detection of anti-Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae IgG in naturally infected pathogen-induced convalescent sera.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Coinfections and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA randomised field trial was conducted on an Austrian farrow-to-finish farm for one year to compare the efficacy of two commercial
resultsIn general, coughing was more frequent during late nursery and finishing. No significant differences were found in the coughing index (0.02 vs 0.03) and mean average daily weight gain (560 vs 550 g) between the two groups. ATR was higher in group 2 (3.8 vs 9.6%). At the slaughterhouse check, significant differences in the prevalence of bronchopneumonia (62.9 vs 71.2%) could be found. Extension of lung lesions was also significantly lower in group 1 in terms of enzootic pneumonia (EP) values (
conclusionsThis trial demonstrated that Hyogen® was superior to Stellamune® Mycoplasma in reducing (I) the prevalence of bronchopneumonic lungs and those affected by cranioventral pleurisy, (II) the extension and severity of EP-like lung lesions, and (III) the rate of antibiotically treated animals against respiratory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.