Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083332›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

Real-life evaluation of the safety, efficacy and therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western tertiary centre.

João Santos-Antunes, Francisco Baldaque-Silva, Margarida Marques, Joanne Lopes, Fátima Carneiro, Guilherme Macedo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Experience in Portugal.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic submucosal dissection on an outpatient basis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

João Santos-AntunesGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Francisco Baldaque-SilvaGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Margarida MarquesGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Joanne LopesPathology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Fátima CarneiroPathology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Guilherme MacedoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.
Hospital de São João · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables accurate pathological evaluation and low recurrence rates. Large series describing ESD outcomes in Western countries are scarce.

objectiveTo evaluate the real-life experience of ESD in a single Western centre.

methodsData of all the patients submitted to ESD in our centre were prospectively recorded in a database, from the first procedure in 2011 until May 2017. Feasibility, en bloc and R0 resection rates and safety were assessed.

resultsThree hundred and one ESDs were performed (37 in submucosal lesions) on 283 patients (54% male). Lesions were located in the oesophagus (

conclusionOur real-life experience shows that ESD is feasible, safe and effective in Western settings.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionWestern real-life experience

Identifiers

PMID30083332
PMCPMC6068789
OpenAlexW2794143469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.