Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083320›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2018

A qualitative study of clinical champions in context: Clinical champions across three levels of acute care.

Mindy E Flanagan, Laurie Plue, Kristine K Miller, Arlene A Schmid, Laura Myers, Glenn Graham, Edward J Miech, Linda S Williams, Teresa M Damush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Facilitators and Barriers of the Use of Prognostic Models for Clinical Decision Making in Acute Neurologic Care: A Systematic Review.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mindy E FlanaganHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-5628
Laurie PlueHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kristine K MillerHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Arlene A SchmidHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Laura MyersCenter for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Glenn GrahamHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Edward J MiechHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-1570
Linda S WilliamsHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Teresa M DamushHSRD VA PRISM QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare activities and field descriptions of clinical champions across three levels of stroke centers.

methodsA cross-sectional qualitative study using quota sampling was conducted. The setting for this study was 38 acute stroke centers based in US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers with 8 designated as Primary, 24 as Limited Hours, and 6 as Stroke Support Centers. Key informants involved in stroke care were interviewed using a semi-structured approach. A cross-case synthesis approach was used to conduct a qualitative analysis of clinical champions' behaviors and characteristics. Clinical champion behaviors were described and categorized across three dimensions: enthusiasm, persistence, and involving the right people.

resultsClinical champions at Primary Stroke Centers represented diverse medical disciplines and departments (education, quality management); directed implementation of acute stroke care processes; coordinated processes across service lines; and benefited from supportive contexts for implementation. Clinical champions at Limited Hours Stroke Centers varied in steering implementation efforts, building collaboration across disciplines, and engaging in other clinical champion activities. Clinical champions at Stroke Support Centers were implementing limited changes to stroke care and exhibited few behaviors fitting the three clinical champion dimensions. Other clinical champion behaviors included educating colleagues, problem-solving, implementing new care pathways, monitoring progress, and standardizing processes.

conclusionThese data demonstrate clinical champion behaviors for implementing changes to complex care processes such as acute stroke care. Changes to complex care processes involved coordination among clinicians from multiple services lines, persistence facing obstacles to change, and enthusiasm for targeted practice changes.

Indexed as

Cardiovascularclinical championcritical care/emergency medicineimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID30083320
PMCPMC6075611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.