Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083275›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2018

The S100A4 Protein Signals through the ErbB4 Receptor to Promote Neuronal Survival.

Stanislava Pankratova, Jorg Klingelhofer, Oksana Dmytriyeva, Sylwia Owczarek, Alexander Renziehausen, Nelofer Syed, Alexandra E Porter, David T Dexter, Darya Kiryushko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigation of the effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. CD146, from a melanoma cell adhesion molecule to a signaling receptor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanislava PankratovaLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jorg KlingelhoferLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oksana DmytriyevaLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sylwia OwczarekLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexander RenziehausenJohn Fulcher Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Burlington Danes Building, 160 Du Cane Road, W12 0NN London, UK.
Nelofer SyedJohn Fulcher Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Burlington Danes Building, 160 Du Cane Road, W12 0NN London, UK.
Alexandra E PorterDepartment of Materials and London Center for Nanotechnology, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, SW72AZ London, UK.
David T DexterCenter for Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Burlington Danes Building, 160 Du Cane Road, W12 0NN London, UK.
Darya KiryushkoDepartment of Materials and London Center for Nanotechnology, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, SW72AZ London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKHammersmith Hospital · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of neurodegeneration is crucial for development of therapies to treat neurological disorders. S100 proteins are extensively expressed in the injured brain but S100's role and signalling in neural cells remain elusive. We recently demonstrated that the S100A4 protein protects neurons in brain injury and designed S100A4-derived peptides mimicking its beneficial effects. Here we show that neuroprotection by S100A4 involves the growth factor family receptor ErbB4 and its ligand Neuregulin 1 (NRG), key regulators of neuronal plasticity and implicated in multiple brain pathologies. The neuroprotective effect of S100A4 depends on ErbB4 expression and the ErbB4 signalling partners ErbB2/Akt, and is reduced by functional blockade of NRG/ErbB4 in cell models of neurodegeneration. We also detect binding of S100A4 with ErbB1 (EGFR) and ErbB3. S100A4-derived peptides interact with, and signal through ErbB, are neuroprotective in primary and immortalized dopaminergic neurons, and do not affect cell proliferation/motility - features which make them promising as potential neuroprotectants. Our data suggest that the S100-ErbB axis may be an important mechanism regulating neuronal survival and plasticity.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsCell SurvivalNeuregulin-1Neuronal PlasticityNeuronsRatsReceptor, ErbB-4S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4Erbb4 protein, ratNeuregulin-1Nrg1 protein, ratReceptor, ErbB-4S100a4 protein, ratS100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4ErbBneuroprotectionpeptideS100S100A4

Identifiers

PMID30083275
PMCPMC6071530
OpenAlexW2850837604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.